The fsa was a compromise measure that did not correct all the injustices of the crackpowder disparity. It is this ratio that has resulted in crack offenders spending decades in prison while powder cocaine offenders convicted of offenses involving the same weight often spend less than two years in prison. When the crack powder sentencing disparity was enacted into law in the 1980s, crack cocaine was believed to be more addictive and more dangerous than powder cocaine. An examination of risk for arrest and socioeconomic disparities in use joseph j.
Growing support in white house and congress to address crack. This 100 to 1 disparity has frequently been cited by drug war opponents as exhibit a to buttress their claim that drug laws are racist. Criminal division aag breuer testimony re restoring fairness. Dec 27, 2008 germane to this discussion is an understanding of the often discussed 100. Data show racial disparity in crack sentencing us news. The fair sentencing act amends existing laws by increasing the amounts of crack that trigger these penalties, from five grams to 28 grams for fiveyear minimum sentences and from 50 grams to 280 grams for tenyear minimum sentences. This disparity between crack and powder cocaine was driven by fear, instead of by research, of the intensity and perceived dangers of crack. May 25, 2011 to be charged with a felony, crack users needed to possess only 5 grams of the drug. Whereas, proposals to remove the federal mandatory minimums for crack and powder cocaine, and to otherwise eliminate the disparity for crack and powder cocaine by sentencing crack in the same manner that powder cocaine is currently sentenced, would threaten efforts to investigate and prosecute significant and violent drug offenders that deal. This arbitrary and discriminatory disparity between powder and crack cocaine implicates the section 3553a2a factors.
May 25, 2011 under the current law, crack users possessing only 5 grams of the drug are charged with a felony to get the same charge, powder cocaine users have to be caught with 500 grams. What is the chemical difference between crack cocaine and powder cocaine that justified this disparity. The public, and members of congress, believed that crack was more addictive and dangerous to the public due to the fast, intense high that smoking it gives. In the three decades prior to the passing of the fair sentencing act, those who were arrested for possessing crack cocaine faced much more severe penalties than those in possession of powder cocaine. Under the current law, crack users possessing only 5 grams of the drug are charged with a felony to get the same charge, powder cocaine users have to be caught with 500 grams. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a minimum 5year federal prisonsentence, while distribution of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same 5year mandatory minimum sentence. Fair sentencing act american civil liberties union. The amount of powder cocaine necessary to trigger the sentence is still five kilos. Arizona arizona lawmakers established a zero tolerance approach towards drugs which prioritized drug enforcement and contributed to prison population growth. Bidens role in passing the lesserknown 1986 law and creating the crackpowder disparity reveals how he grappled with policies years earlier. Apr 29, 2009 the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine.
Mar 05, 2015 the fair sentencing act of 2010 was an important first step in restoring sanity to our sentencing laws for crackcocaine, but theres more that needs to be done. Under the 2010 law, the amount of crack that triggers the fiveyear minimum is 28 grams of crack or 500 grams of powder, and, for the tenyear minimum, 280 grams of crack and 5,000 of powder. Powder cocaine use is more evenly spread among ethnic backgrounds, and more white americans have tried powder cocaine than black americans. Crack and cocaine also differ in the manner in which they are used. This 100to1 disparity has frequently been cited by drug war opponents as exhibit a to buttress their claim that drug laws are racist. The 1986 law created a 100 to 1 disparity between the sentencing guidelines for crack and powder cocaine. In committing ourselves to pursuing federal cocaine sentencing policy reform, we do not suggest in any way that our prosecutors or law enforcement agents have acted improperly or imprudently during the last 15 years. Crack and powder cocaine have similar pharmacological and physiological effects on the body, as major studies have shown us.
The courts may use a lower ratio, as the sentencing commission and numerous scholars and judges have suggested, provided that they still abide by the mandatory minimum set forth in 18 u. President obama signed the new sentencing law on august 3, 2010. Now, the ten year sentence is triggered by 280 grams of crack instead of 50. Although the commission immediately used the 100to1 ratio to define base offense levels for all crack and powder offenses, it later determined that the crackpowder sentencing disparity is generally unwarranted.
A comprehensive examination of the 100 to 1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a minimum 5year federal prisonsentence, while distribution of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same 5year mandatory minimum sentence. Apr 30, 2009 the 1986 and 1988 antidrug abuse acts created a disparity in sentencing between two forms of cocaine, crack cocaine and powder, at the federal level even though scientific evidence, including a. New legislation would erase crackpowder cocaine disparity. Crackpowder sentencing disparity reduced by congress. Now that disparity is being reduced from 100to1 to 18to1. To be hit with the same charge, powder cocaine users needed to be caught with 500 grams. So, the federal law still imposes a different and harsher sentence for crack cocaine possession than it does for powder cocaine possession, but the disparity is not nearly as great as under the 1986 act. Cracked justice updated 32411 2 sentencing project. Some 2020 democratic candidate argue that the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, which now sits at 18 to 1, should be eliminated entirely. The next logical steps are to make the fsa retroactive, and to eradicate completely the disparity between powder and crack. Dec 20, 2018 he was affected not only by the crack powder disparity, but also by the three strikes law for drug offenders. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a. Now that disparity is being reduced from 100 to 1 to 18 to 1.
Most disturbingly, because the majority of people arrested for crack offenses are african american. Some 2020 democratic candidate argue that the sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine, which now sits at 18to1, should be eliminated entirely. Finally, the crack powder disparity results in a disparite impact along racial lines, with black offenders suffering significantly harsher penalties. Although better, the disparity is still grossly disproportionate. Jul 28, 2019 the 100to1 crack cocaine to powder cocaine quantity ratio is a primary cause of the growing disparity between sentences for black and white federal defendants, the commission wrote. Under the old sentencing guidelines, the penalty for possessing a gram of crack cocaine was the same as that for possessing 100 grams or about 312 ounces of powder cocaine, with a corresponding. Congress is considering a bill to change drug laws that punish crack cocaine violations more severely than those for powder cocaine. While a person found with five grams of crack cocaine faced a fiveyear mandatory minimum prison sentence.
Another difference between crack and cocaine relates to the high produced. We wrote this paper to inform the public and congress about the disparities in the sentencing laws between crack and powder cocaine, which. Cocaine is typically snorted, and crack is typically smoked. An end to crackpowder cocaine sentencing disparity. African americans had a high risk for lifetime and recent crack use, and blacks who used powder or crack cocaine typically engaged in use at higher frequencies. The bill that was passed which included the crack powder sentencing disparity did. Oct 23, 2009 naacp supported legislation to end the 100. How an early biden crime bill created the sentencing disparity for. Thus, when the situation that gave rise to the initial disparity has changed, that warrants reconsideration of the disparity. Under what is commonly referred to as the 100to1 cocaine sentencing disparity, it takes one hundred times as much powder cocaine as crack cocaine. The sentencing disparities between crack and cocaine attn. That resulted in a disparity with powder of about 18 to 1.
Drug policy alliance and other national groups bring advocates and formerly incarcerated to d. The bipartisan measure addressed the 100 to 1 disparity that punished defendants with five grams of crack cocaine also known as cocaine base with the same fiveyear mandatory minimum penalty imposed on powder cocaine defendants with 100 times that amount. Cocaine is generally found in white powder form, and crack is found in a rock form that is generally white, cream, tan, or light brown. The punishment difference between crackcocaine and powdercocaine exposes an unjust feature in the american justice system, a system. Powder disparity the data tell us that it is time to restore the balance. The fsas alterations to crack mandatory minimum sentences were not made retroactive something only congress can do, by passing legislation. Because crack and powder cocaine are two forms of the same drug, there should not be any disparity in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine offenses the only truly fair ratio is 1. Crack is cheaper, so its found in low income communities more than pure powder cocaine. Feb 19, 2015 socioeconomically disadvantaged adults are more likely to use crack over powder cocaine, and are thus more likely to be subject to arrest. Legislators adopted a crack powder sentencing disparity of 12 to 1 in 1993.
Crackpowder sentencing disparity reduced by congress huffpost. How an early biden crime bill created the sentencing. Aug 03, 2010 data show racial disparity in crack sentencing. This disparity between crack and powder cocaine was driven by fear, instead of by research, of the intensity and perceived dangers of crack cocaine.
Regardless of changes in the federal law, a charge of crack or powder cocaine is a very serious charge. In response, the antidrug abuse act of 1986 included a provision that created the disparity between federal penalties for crack cocaine and powder cocaine. Jun 11, 2016 in the mid 80s, congress passed the antidrug abuse act of 1986. Higher education and higher family income were negatively associated with crack use, and fulltime employment increased the chances of using powder cocaine. To be charged with a felony, crack users needed to possess only 5 grams of the drug.
1538 888 1549 1222 871 439 371 1287 1200 1400 1010 1218 874 203 1520 434 1570 429 1007 617 299 940 73 959 428 134 1072 507 441 810 268